Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Ese umukoresha yemerewe guhindura amasezerano y’umurimo?

Under Rwandan labor law, employment contracts serve as the foundational agreement between an employer and an employee, detailing duties, remuneration, and working conditions. While circumstances such as economic shifts, organizational restructuring, or the adoption of new technologies may prompt an employer to propose changes to these contracts, such modifications are subject to specific legal requirements. According to Law No. 66/2018 governing labor in Rwanda, an employment contract may be modified during its term if both parties reach a mutual agreement. The law does not grant employers the unilateral right to alter essential terms—such as salary or job responsibilities—simply due to internal business challenges. Any proposed change requires the consent of the employee. Legal precedents, including rulings by the Court of Appeal, clarify the distinction between refusing a contract modification and failing to perform job duties. In the case of EAR Diocese of Shyira vs. Uwingabiye Monique (July 19, 2024), the court emphasized that an employer must have a valid, legally recognized reason to modify a contract. If an employee refuses to sign a new contract, the employer may terminate the existing one, but only if the termination itself follows legal procedures. The court noted that the refusal to sign a new contract is not, in itself, sufficient grounds for dismissal; rather, the legitimacy of the termination depends on the underlying justification for the proposed changes. Similarly, in Nyirabwiza Justine vs. Unguka Bank Plc (April 20, 2023), the Court of Appeal highlighted the necessity of following mandatory procedures, such as notifying the labor inspector when conducting layoffs due to economic or technological reasons. Failure to adhere to these procedural requirements can render a termination unlawful. While employers have the authority to transfer employees to different positions for the benefit of the organization, this power is limited. Transfers must involve roles of equivalent status and must not result in a reduction of salary or benefits. This authority cannot be used as a pretext to demote an employee or unilaterally alter core contract terms. For employees, legal experts advise that when presented with a new contract, one should carefully review all proposed changes, including salary, duties, and working hours. If an employee disagrees with the modifications, it is recommended to document these objections in writing to clarify that the dispute concerns contract terms rather than a refusal to work. Ultimately, while the law protects employees from forced contract changes, it also recognizes the employer’s need to manage business operations. When disputes arise, the focus of legal review is whether the employer had a valid, evidence-based reason for the changes, whether they attempted to negotiate in good faith, and whether the subsequent termination—if it occurs—complies with all statutory requirements.

Article source: Umuseke | Image credit: Umuseke

Follow us on Instagram: @news.tringlobe
Follow WhatsApp channel: Tringlobe Media WhatsApp Channel
Join a WhatsApp group: Join Rwanda WhatsApp group

Follow our Whatsapp channel
Like and follow us on Facebook
News Desk
News Desk
News Desk is the editorial publishing account for Tringlobe Media News, covering breaking news, public affairs, entertainment, community developments and regional stories across Trinidad and Tobago, the Caribbean and internationally.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles

Click to listen highlighted text!