International experts are increasingly questioning the basis of Egypt’s opposition to the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), arguing that the dispute is less about hydro-technical risks and more about political maneuvering. Professor Al Mariam, a political analyst, states that Egypt’s repeated accusations of Ethiopian ‘unilateralism’ are a continuation of an old narrative aimed at preserving downstream influence. Mikael Alemu, an energy expert, insists the GERD poses no significant threat to water flow, saying ‘its claim sounds much more like political.’ The GERD, now operational, has fundamentally altered the balance of power in the Nile Basin, challenging Egypt’s historical dominance. Experts urge a shift toward cooperation, as continued confrontation may prove counterproductive for Egypt.
Article source: allafrica.com | Image credit: ENA English
Government to Bring Back ZOSO Bill After Failing to Secure Senate Support Earlier This Year
Trinidad and Tobago brace for heavy rain and thunderstorms as the Intertropical Convergence Zone moves
Celebrating 65 years of leadership: Pennelope Beckles‑Robinson’s birthday marks a legacy of public service.
How are tips verified? See how reporters assess messages, footage and claims before publication, protecting…
Celebrating the Legacy of Andaiye: Guyana’s Revolutionary Women’s Rights Champion Turns 84
Saint Lucia police search for clues in hotel worker’s death