The United National Congress (UNC)-led administration officially assumed governance of Trinidad and Tobago in early May 2025, following its victory in the April general election. With their first 100 days in office now completed, the period has been marked by a mix of early reforms, bold policy decisions, and public debate.
Early Actions and Positive Developments
From the outset, the UNC government moved quickly to reverse or amend several controversial policies inherited from the previous administration. Among the most notable steps were:
Repeal of the Trinidad and Tobago Revenue Authority (TTRA)
Freeze on T&TEC electricity rates for consumers
Adjustments to property tax measures to ease financial pressure on households
Extended school vacation by one additional week
Launch of national consultations on proposed “stand-your-ground” legislation
These measures, coupled with increased engagement between the central government and the Tobago House of Assembly, have been praised by some as signs of a people-focused approach to governance.
Criticisms and Controversies
Despite these early moves, the UNC’s first 100 days have not been without controversy. The mass dismissal of workers from CEPEP, URP, and the Reforestation Programme has been heavily criticized by opponents, who argue the action contradicts campaign promises of job creation.
The firing of the Central Bank governor also drew sharp scrutiny, with critics warning that such decisions could undermine investor confidence and destabilize financial institutions. Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles described the period as one of “chaos, cover-ups, and poor decision-making,” citing ongoing fiscal challenges, foreign exchange instability, and a lack of a clear crime-fighting strategy.
Public Engagement and Expectations
One of the government’s standout commitments has been its promise to report directly to the nation on its first 100 days in office. Energy Minister Dr. Roodal Moonilal confirmed that a detailed review will be delivered to outline the administration’s accomplishments, setbacks, and plans moving forward.
It’s worth noting that many citizens did not expect the UNC to achieve significant changes within such a short time frame, especially as the government has stated that it inherited a “scale of challenges” from the previous administration. While this is the UNC’s position, some members of the public see it as a reasonable explanation, while others view it as a political justification for slow progress.
A Divided Public View
For supporters, the UNC’s first 100 days represent a fresh start and a willingness to act decisively. For critics, the same period highlights policy inconsistency and unfulfilled promises.
What remains clear is that the administration’s next steps—particularly in crime reduction, fiscal management, and service delivery—will determine whether this early momentum translates into lasting national progress.
