The Constitutional Court’s sessions have recently been opened to public scrutiny, raising questions about the transparency of its proceedings. A notable example is the case in which a request for a constitutional review of several provisions of the Building Management and Maintenance Act was rejected. The petition was filed by 31 opposition members of parliament and 232 petitioners. The Court’s decision, which spans 69 pages, includes separate opinions from two judges. Observers of the Court’s rulings note that the structure of its decisions is consistent. Each decision begins with a concise statement of the case’s substance, followed by a summary of the petitioner’s position and the state body’s response. In constitutional complaints, the decision also outlines the procedural flow and highlights key points of reasoning from both administrative and judicial bodies. The Court cites relevant statutes, draws on general legal positions from its own practice and from European courts, and explains how these apply to the specific case at hand. When evaluating legislation, the Court applies a set of standard tests. First, it examines formal procedural compliance. Next, it assesses the legitimacy of the law’s objective. Finally, it conducts a proportionality
Article source: Večernji List | Image credit: Večernji List