The Dutch embassy in Suriname recently hosted an information session regarding the new subsidy program, “Social Initiatives Trans-Atlantic Slavery Past for Suriname (2026-2030),” which has allocated over 28 million euros for projects related to the history of slavery. The funds are intended for organizations and individuals who submit successful project proposals. During the session, representatives from various interested organizations raised critical questions regarding the implementation of the program. Concerns were voiced about the role of the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO), which is tasked with evaluating the applications. Critics noted that the RVO will apply Dutch administrative and legal frameworks to the submissions, leading to concerns about whether these standards are appropriate for the Surinamese context. Participants expressed frustration over the application process, which requires the completion of forms described by the RVO as “accessible.” However, attendees argued that the terminology and requirements may not align with the local context of the target group—descendants of enslaved people—and noted that the RVO has not provided a local partner to assist with the application process. In response to these concerns, RVO representatives stated that they would consider potential adjustments if significant issues arise during future subsidy rounds. The current structure of the program follows a period of stalled efforts to establish a collaborative framework. Previously, the Dutch government appointed a special envoy to coordinate on the slavery past dossier, with the intention that Suriname would form a platform of relevant organizations led by former minister Silvano Tjong-Ahin. This platform did not materialize, reportedly due to internal disagreements among various Surinamese organizations representing descendants of enslaved people. As a result, the Dutch government has proceeded with the rollout of the program based on its own administrative frameworks. The situation has prompted debate regarding the extent of local control over the initiative, with some observers suggesting that the lack of a unified Surinamese approach has allowed the Netherlands to maintain primary authority over the program’s execution.
Article source: De Ware Tijd | Image credit: De Ware Tijd